Category 2 abuse, inappropriate use of restraints, physical abuse unsubstantiated. Preponderance of evidence not established. Subject restrained assaultive Service Recipient.

Category 3, deliberate inappropriate use of restraint substantiated. Subject picked up service recipient, performed restraint with improper technique inconsistent with plans & policy.

Category 2 neglect, failure to document and report not found; injury unlikely. Category 3 deliberate inappropriate use of restraints & neglect found based on video.

Category 1 neglect: immediate medical attention not sought; failed to properly position during seizure. Category 2 abuse: false account given in statement. Category 1 abuse: false statements to obstruct.

Category 3 abuse deliberate inappropriate use of restraints not found. Subject placing arm around Service Recipient’s head/neck in restraint not deliberate.

Category 2 physical abuse, deliberate inappropriate use of restraints not found. Subject’s hand on Service Recipient’s neck and push to floor during chokehold not proven.

Category 2 physical abuse found. Hands to Service Recipient’s face. Category 2 restraint not found. Technique not deliberately inconsistent with policies, practices, laws, etc.

Category 3 deliberate inappropriate use of restraints and physical abuse found. Emergency exception not found. Imminent threat of harm was not present.

2 allegations affirmed for excessive force and improper technique with no emergency exception. 1 physical abuse reversed: no proof that scratches occurred during restraint.

Category 2 deliberate inappropriate use of restraint and neglect substantiated. Unnecessary horseplay likely to result in injury.