Category 2 abuse not found. Subject’s use of unauthorized restraint technique found unintentional, not deliberately inconsistent with Service Recipient’s plans, policies, trainings or law.
Category 2 physical abuse and restraint found. Subject performed a restraint with improper technique and excessive force, slamming Service Recipient into wall causing injury.
Category 2 physical abuse and deliberate inappropriate use of restraints found when the Subject struck the Service Recipient on the right side of his head.
Category 3 physical abuse and abuse found. Subject unjustifiably shoved and kneeled on the Service Recipient for more than a minute. No emergency exception.
Category 3 abuse found. Subject performed an unwarranted restraint. Verbal threats did not constitute imminent danger necessitating a restraint. No de-escalation techniques undertaken by Subject.
Multiple allegations of Category 2 and 3 abuse and neglect found. Subject used excessive force and improper technique during restraint of Service Recipient.
Category 2 abuse and neglect found. Subject breached a duty and conducted an unwarranted restraint with improper technique and excessive force. Harm was likely.
Category 3 abuse not found. No evidence that Subject conducted a restraint with improper technique or that Service Recipient’s injury resulted from improper technique.
Multiple allegations of abuse and neglect not found. Subjects testified credibly. Eyewitness was not credible. Service Recipient had a history of fabrication.
Category 3 abuse and neglect found. Subject restrained Service Recipient in wheelchair with a sock and thereby breached a duty of care. Harm was likely.
