Category 1 sex abuse affirmed. Service Recipient incapable of consent. Category 2 neglect affirmed. Subject breached duty by violating code of ethics.

Category 1 sex abuse forcible touching in the 3rd degree and Category 2 neglect affirmed. Service Recipient's statement credited.

Category 3 neglect inappropriate language affirmed. Category 2 neglect did not maintain boundaries affirmed. Category 1 sex abuse affirmed. Service Recipient incapable of consent.

Category 1 sex abuse and Category 2 neglect affirmed. Service Recipient, age 16, cannot consent under Penal Law and professional relationship not maintained.

Category 1 sexual abuse, Category 2 neglect unsubstantiated: numerous inconsistencies. Category 3 neglect found: Subject violated policy hugging Service Recipient. Reduced from Category 2.

Category 1 sexual abuse found where the Subject had vaginal intercourse with the Service Recipient, who was incapable of consent. Allegation 2 unsubstantiated.

Category 1 sexual abuse and Category 2 neglect were both unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence and credibility of the Service Recipient.

Category 1 sexual abuse and Category 2 neglect not found. Preponderance of the evidence not found due to lack of evidence.

Category 1 abuse found: Subject engaged in sexual activities with Service Recipients; no violation of relevant Penal Law when Subject exposed penis or requested oral sex.

Category 1 sexual abuse found when Subject touched the Service Recipient's breast and placed his hands in her pants. Forcible touching found.